Wright HotReport

IF I WERE ON THE 911 COMMITTEE...THIS IS HOW THE QUESTIONING WOULD GO:

WRIGHT: Would it be accurate, Dr. Rice, to say that the vast majority of the planning of the 911 attacks took place during the Clinton Administration?

RICE: Yes it would.

WRIGHT: Would it be accurate to say that the participants came to this country during the Clinton Administration?

RICE: Yes it would.

WRIGHT: Would it be accurate to say that they got their flying lessons during the Clinton Administration?

RICE: Yes it would.

WRIGHT: Would it be accurate to say that most or all of the funding was raised and transferred during the Clinton Administration?

RICE: Yes it would.

WRIGHT: Would it be accurate to say that the deterioration of our intellgence capabilities were handcuffed by liberal policies, backed by those like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry?

RICE: Yes it would.

WRIGHT: Would it be accurate to say that the Clinton Reno policy of treating terrorists like criminals and putting them in front of the grand jury also handcuffed communication between intelligence agencies?

RICE: Yes it would.

WRIGHT: then why the hell are we questioning YOU?

RICE: #$%&*^%$% if I know.

WRIGHT: Thank you, Madaam Presi -- er Dr. Rice.

REMEMBER: RICE 08 0r 12 or whatever...you heard it here FIRST.

JUST WHEN YOU DON'T THINK THE LIBERALS CAN GET MORE STUPID ON TERROR...along comes John Kerry today and says that Mosque dwelling terrorist Al Sadr and his "hate the west" newspaper is a legitimate voice in Iraq and that our attacking him is trying to "silence" a legitimate voice.

You guys have got to get a clue....Jerry Falwell is irritating..but he's NOT the religious terror of the planet...these Mulsim extremists are...and Al Sadr is one of the worst anywhere. His newspaper, his militia and his Mosque (gasp!!!!) need to be destroyed.

BTW...a Mosque, or any other building, that is used as a hide out for the bad guys...IS A LEGIT MILITARY TARGET. Period. And it doesn't matter what that building is sometimes used for or once was used for. Not that Muslim militarism is a legitimate religion anyway. It's not.

OF COURSE, with rare insight, Kerry did mention that Al Sadr has aligned lately with groups that are "sort of terror related." Those groups who are sort of terror related? Just Hamas and Hezbollah. Thanks John. What brilliance. You're exactly who we need calling the shots as commander in chief.

AND NOW COMES ANITA HILL...thrown up now as an expert on Condi Rice. HUH? Why? What does Anita Hill know about foreign policy? What does she know about national defense? What does she know about terrorism and anti-terror efforts? What does she know about Condi Rice?

Nothing, nothing, nothing and nothing. But she's a BLACK WOMAN and to liberals (who CLAIM to be color blind) that's all that matters.

Doesn't this prove who the REAL RACISTS ARE? Of course....it's those on the left who define everything by color and gender. Only a liberal would even think that Anita Hill has anything in common with Condi Rice. The only thing they have in common are the liberal measuring rods.

IF THERE HAS EVER BEEN A HUMAN WITH MORE APPROPO initials than Barbara Streisand...I would like to know who that would be. Reccently, BS has been on the Richard Clarke vs Condi Rice thing...and of course, BS believes Clarke over Rice. She recently was incredulous that anyone would belive Rice and the administration's take on the handling of pre-911 intelligence over Clarke's take. Well BS, let me hazard a guess why that would be:

Perhaps its because conservatives have been pro-intelligence and pro defense for decades while liberals like yourself have been anti intelligence (in SO many ways) and anti-defense for decades...

...and perhaps it's because Clarke and the Clinton administration did less about Al Quaida in EIGHT YEARS than the Bush group did in seven months....

...and perhaps it's because the entire briefing from the Clinton Adm to the Bush Adm on National Defense issues NEVER MENTIONED Al Quaida once in over 45 thousand words while Condi Rice in interview well before 9-11 shows she knew all about Al Quaida and all about holes in our intelligence services that make us vulnerable to their attacks.

Gee BS...do you think it could have ANYTHING to do with any of that? In other words BS...it's the TRUTH that causes Americans to believe Rice and Bush over Clarke et al.

CHRIS MATTHEWS OF COURSE is rarely persuaded by the truth, however, and the liberal loudmouth is now wondering aloud on his HARDBALL show what it is that Condi Rice is lying about. Oh, he's convinced she's lying about something....he just doesn't yet know what it is.I can hardly wait for him to digest the fact that Clarke and Clinton knew diddly about Al Quaida and said even diddlier in their defense breifing....damn I love it when we can hang em with their OWN WRITTEN WORDS.

Of course, you'll hear little to nothing about this briefing in the mainstream liberal press....hurts their story, you know.

LIBS AND BLACK WOMEN; this whole trashing of Condi Rice brings up an interesting point. Liberals will support the most idiotic black women in most cases....Jocelyn Elders....Sheila Jackson Lee.....Carol Mostly Brown....Cynthia McKinney....all these prominent black women are blithering idiots....likely with a cumulative IQ lower than Condi's....and not have as stylish in any way, shape or form....but you would never get Matthews or any other lib in the press to EVER say anything about these idiots. But by God...watch em go after Condi. (AND WATCH THEM FAIL).

You read it hear first...Condi as the first BLACK and first WOMAN President. Don't be surprised. Don't be too surprised if Richard Cardio Cheney backs off the ticket in 04 in favor of Rice. I would love it!

Either way, I'm starting the Rice for President in 08 campaign....

THE LIBERAL ARE REALLY starting to twist and turn in their attempts to attack the Prez. As they wait for Condi to appear before the vaunted 9-11 committee...they are blaming Bush and his administration for NOT DOING BEFORE 911 WHAT THEY WERE AGAINST AFTER 9-11. I mean, let's break that down. Many of them were against going into Afghanistan after the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon, et al...yet today they are saying that Bush should have, in seven months, destroyed Al Quaida and Bin Laden during a time when most Americans (educated by our wonderful public schools) couldn't even tell you who Bin Laden was or where Afghanistan was.

CAN YOU IMAGINE the hissy they would have thrown if Bush had started a policy, of say, let's call it "pre-emption" against Afghanistan pre 9-11? They would have been even more outraged than they were after 9-11.

But this is their game plan now....just like Kerry last week on gas prices. Now we know that all good liberals want HIGHER AND HIGHER gas prices to discourage driving. Especially limosuine liberals like Kerry...whose lifestyle won't be affected one iota by high fuel prices.But last week he was blaming the Bush administration for not using their oil company connections to lower prices. Huh? For the past year and half, they've been having coniptions over Cheney supposedly meeting with oil company and other energy execs in secret meetings...and now he's mad they aren't meeting enough with these guys.

WHICH IS A LOT LIKE his Benedict Arnold speech about CEO's of American companies having plants and facilities overseas...shipping out American jobs....all the while Heinz has 57 (no kidding, 57) of their 79 manufacturing facilities OVERSEAS. I guess it's ok as long as it's padding a liberal family's trust funds.....